MLB Betting Analyzer

Thursday, July 02 2026  |  Run at 12:14 AM
Game Bets · NRFI · K Props · Batter Props · Injuries · Weather
Odds API Quota
324 / 20000 requests used (19676 remaining)

PERFORMANCE

Auto-verified via MLB Stats API

Recent (14d)

RecordWin%P&L
Overall201W–128L–0P61%+8.41 uLast 14 days • 329 settled
Grade A21W–10L–0P68%+5.00 u
Grade B180W–118L–0P60%+3.42 u

All-time

RecordWin%P&L
Overall1874W–1337L–8P58%-133.81 uAll-time • 3219 settled
Grade A196W–139L–0P59%+6.65 u
Grade B1678W–1198L–8P58%-140.46 u
25 pending

Pending Bets

DateTypePlayLineOddsSizeResultP&LActual
2026-05-11Pitcher Hits AllowNathan Eovaldi5.5-143-PENDING-
2026-05-14Batter Total BasesByron Buxton1.5-121-PENDING-
2026-05-17Batter Total BasesShea Langeliers1.5-138-PENDING-
2026-05-20Batter Total BasesKyle Schwarber1.5-131-PENDING-
2026-06-01K PropChase Burns6.5-148-PENDING-
2026-06-08Batter WalksRodolfo Duran0.5-368-PENDING-
2026-06-09Batter WalksTyler Freeman0.5-440-PENDING-
2026-06-11Batter HitsJake McCarthy1.5-258-PENDING-
2026-06-11Batter WalksIldemaro Vargas0.5-434-PENDING-
2026-06-12Batter WalksEzequiel Tovar0.5-409-PENDING-
2026-06-13Batter WalksKeibert Ruiz0.5-431-PENDING-
2026-06-14Batter WalksJ.T. Realmuto0.5-370-PENDING-
2026-06-14Batter WalksJimmy Crooks0.5-296-PENDING-
2026-06-15Pitcher WalksTroy Melton1.5-144-PENDING-
2026-06-19Pitcher Earned RunCade Cavalli1.5-172-PENDING-
2026-06-20K PropNathan Eovaldi5.5-130-PENDING-
2026-06-20Pitcher Earned RunNathan Eovaldi1.5-173-PENDING-
2026-07-01Pitcher Earned RunZac Gallen2.5-155-PENDING-
2026-07-01Pitcher OutsZac Gallen17.5-140-PENDING-
2026-07-01Pitcher WalksTrevor McDonald1.5-167-PENDING-
2026-07-02K PropChase Burns6.5-158-PENDING-
2026-07-02K PropJacob Misiorowski9.5104-PENDING-
2026-07-02K PropJared Jones4.5-164-PENDING-
2026-07-02K PropNathan Eovaldi6.5-118-PENDING-
2026-07-02K PropWalbert Urena4.5-119-PENDING-

Recent Grade A Settled

DateTypePlayLineOddsSizeResultP&LActual
2026-07-01K PropTatsuya Imai5.5-147-LOSS-1.000Tatsuya Imai: 2.0 (line 5.5)
2026-07-01K PropTroy Melton4.5-115-WIN+0.870Troy Melton: 7.0 (line 4.5)

MARKET TRUST TIERS

17 market(s) with settled tracker history
MarketTrustSeason NSeason WRSeason P&L14d N14d WR14d P&LGrade A NGrade A WRReview-only N
K Prop✅ TRUSTED34458%+3.55u6467%+9.98u16161%64
Pitcher Hits Allowed✅ TRUSTED29858%+11.48u6664%+7.21u333%6
Run Line✅ TRUSTED13854%-3.08u0-+0.00u4163%1
Batter Walks👀 WATCH62772%-9.06u0-+0.00u580%134
Pitcher Earned Runs👀 WATCH23559%-0.21u10357%-4.29u1100%9
Pitcher Walks👀 WATCH17259%-8.98u7557%-7.08u0-11
Batter Hits👀 WATCH3778%+3.90u0-+0.00u0-23
Batter Total Bases👀 WATCH3155%+0.66u0-+0.00u0-37
F5 ML👀 WATCH2848%+4.54u0-+0.00u0-0
No HR U1.5👀 WATCH922%-5.18u0-+0.00u0-0
Moneyline👀 WATCH650%+2.85u0-+0.00u0-0
NRFI👀 WATCH333%+0.00u0-+0.00u0-0
YRFI👀 WATCH2100%+0.00u0-+0.00u0-0
Pitcher Outs🔬 RESEARCH9345%-12.74u1164%+1.15u250%8
Total🔬 RESEARCH5038%-10.52u0-+0.00u1100%7
F5 Total🔬 RESEARCH10%-1.00u0-+0.00u0-6
Batter H+R+RBI⛔ PAUSED48450%-56.69u0-+0.00u7053%355

Raw edge is an uncalibrated ranking/debug signal. Trust tiers come from Best/Good settled tracker performance; review-only rows are shown separately.

MARKET PROMOTION CRITERIA

What each market needs to move stages
MarketCurrent StageNext StageProgressPromotion Blockers
K Prop✅ TRUSTEDMaintain Trusted4/4No blocker
Pitcher Hits Allowed✅ TRUSTEDMaintain Trusted4/4No blocker
Run Line✅ TRUSTEDMaintain Trusted2/4season P&L non-negative; 14d sample >= 10
Batter Walks👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
Pitcher Earned Runs👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season P&L positive; 14d P&L non-negative; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
Pitcher Walks👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season P&L positive; 14d P&L non-negative; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
Batter Hits👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
Batter Total Bases👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
F5 ML👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
No HR U1.5👀 WATCH✅ Trusted1/5season sample >= 50; season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10
Moneyline👀 WATCH✅ Trusted2/5season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10; Grade A sample >= 20 and WR >= 55% or Grade B sample >= 50, WR >= 55%, P&L > 0
NRFI👀 WATCH✅ Trusted1/5season sample >= 50; season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10
YRFI👀 WATCH✅ Trusted1/5season sample >= 50; season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10
Pitcher Outs🔬 RESEARCH👀 Watch3/5season P&L positive; Grade A sample >= 10 and WR >= 52%
Total🔬 RESEARCH👀 Watch1/5season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10; 14d WR >= 52%
F5 Total🔬 RESEARCH👀 Watch0/5season sample >= 50; season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10
Batter H+R+RBI⛔ PAUSED🔬 Research2/5diagnostic/component model has settled validation; season P&L non-negative; 14d sample >= 10

Promotion criteria keep markets from getting stuck in purgatory: each stage has explicit evidence needed for the next stage.

DIAGNOSTIC VS RECOMMENDATION IMPACT

Runtime signal usage matrix
ComponentStatusCurrent UsageRecommendation ImpactNext Action
K Prop✅ TRUSTEDActive recommendation market; 5 actionable / 14 total candidate(s); season N 344, 14d N 64Can produce Best Play / Good Add signals.Maintain Trusted; No blocker
Pitcher Hits Allowed✅ TRUSTEDActive recommendation market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 298, 14d N 66Can produce Best Play / Good Add signals.Maintain Trusted; No blocker
Run Line✅ TRUSTEDActive recommendation market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 138, 14d N 0Can produce Best Play / Good Add signals.Maintain Trusted; season P&L non-negative; 14d sample >= 10
PitcherAssessmentLIVEShared pitcher context; 18 starter assessment(s) emitted.Active context for pitcher and batter engines; diagnostic table elsewhere.Monitor assessment quality and data gaps.
Savant Pitch QualityLIVEFree public-data diagnostics; 18/18 assessment(s) scored.Diagnostic-only replacement path for paid PLV; does not change recommendations.Validate supported vs unsupported settled results before activation.
Player ContextLIVEHome/away, day/night, recent-return, and workload diagnostics.Context notes and real role/workload risks only; no global threshold changes.Validate split and health-ramp signals before scoring them.
Batter Hits👀 WATCHActive watch-stage market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 37, 14d N 0Can surface recommendations with trust caution; promotion waits for evidence.✅ Trusted; season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10
Batter Total Bases👀 WATCHActive watch-stage market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 31, 14d N 0Can surface recommendations with trust caution; promotion waits for evidence.✅ Trusted; season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10
F5 ML👀 WATCHActive watch-stage market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 28, 14d N 0Can surface recommendations with trust caution; promotion waits for evidence.✅ Trusted; season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10
Moneyline👀 WATCHActive watch-stage market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 6, 14d N 0Can surface recommendations with trust caution; promotion waits for evidence.✅ Trusted; season sample >= 50; 14d sample >= 10
Pitcher Outs🔬 RESEARCHResearch / held market; 0 actionable / 3 total candidate(s); season N 93, 14d N 11Held from actionable output unless explicitly validated.👀 Watch; season P&L positive; Grade A sample >= 10 and WR >= 52%
No HR🔬 RESEARCHResearch / held market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s)Held from actionable output unless explicitly validated.Validate forward results before promotion.
Total🔬 RESEARCHResearch / held market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 50, 14d N 0Held from actionable output unless explicitly validated.👀 Watch; season P&L positive; 14d sample >= 10
F5 Total🔬 RESEARCHResearch / held market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 1, 14d N 0Held from actionable output unless explicitly validated.👀 Watch; season sample >= 50; season P&L positive
Batter H+R+RBI⛔ PAUSEDPaused shadow market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s); season N 484, 14d N 0No actionable recommendations.🔬 Research; diagnostic/component model has settled validation; season P&L non-negative
Batter Hits+Runs+RBIs⛔ PAUSEDPaused shadow market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s)No actionable recommendations.Build or validate replacement signal before unpausing.
Batter Hits Runs RBIs⛔ PAUSEDPaused shadow market; 0 actionable / 0 total candidate(s)No actionable recommendations.Build or validate replacement signal before unpausing.
HRR Component Research⛔ PAUSEDShadow component research; 0 candidate(s) emitted.No recommendation impact while HRR remains paused.Validate component record before unpausing HRR.
AI ReviewAPI ERROROptional post-run advisory review of settled results and model behavior.Advisory only; cannot change recommendations, tracker saves, or thresholds.Provider call failed; check quota, billing, model access, or key project.

This table is generated from runtime market status, market health, and run diagnostics. It explains whether a signal is active, held, research-only, or configuration-needed.

DATA READINESS

Input data availability for this run
READYAvailableSavant: 719 pitcher(s) with metrics
READYAvailableSavant 1st-inn: 299 pitcher(s) with 1st-inning splits
READYAvailableTeam NRFI streaks: 30 teams | 30 with streak ≥5
READYAvailablePitch-type matchup data: 30 team(s), 207 team×pitch-type combinations
READYAvailablePitcher arsenal: 704 pitcher(s), 3066 pitch-type profiles
READYAvailableBatter pitch-type profiles: 542 player(s)
READYAvailableHandedness: 18 pitcher(s) | Team splits: 30 team(s)
READYAvailableTeam recent batting: 18 team(s) with last-7 K/BB/contact rates
LATE DATANon-blockingLineups not yet posted — using team tendencies & season stats (re-run after 4 PM for lineup refresh)
READYAvailableBVP context: 18 roster team(s), 234 hitter(s) | 18 SP matchup(s), 597 career PA
READYAvailableBatter handedness: 234 active-roster player(s) available pre-lineup; lineup order refreshes when posted
LATE DATANon-blockingUmpires not yet assigned — umpire K-rate adjustments skipped
READYAvailableRest data: 18 team(s) | Back-to-back: Philadelphia Phillies, Milwaukee Brewers, Colorado Rockies, Detroit Tigers, Los Angeles Dodgers, Cincinnati Reds, Miami Marlins, Chicago White Sox, Texas Rangers, San Diego Padres, Pittsburgh Pirates, Atlanta Braves, Tampa Bay Rays, Kansas City Royals, St. Louis Cardinals, Cleveland Guardians
READYAvailableBullpen data: 18 team(s) | Fatigued pens: Atlanta Braves
READYAvailableBullpen HR vulnerability: 31 team(s)
READYAvailableWeather: 0 game(s) with meaningful conditions
READYAvailableLine movement: 98 market side(s) checked | 98 opening snapshot(s) created | 0 with movement
READYAvailableMarket health: 17 market(s) loaded from tracker
READYAvailablePlayer context: lazy game-log split and recent-return diagnostics enabled
LIMITEDNon-blockingF5: disabled
READYAvailableNo-HR model: 9 game(s) scored | 0 above probability threshold | 0 with DK implied prob
READYAvailableHR layers: batter Statcast 586 | batter bats 301 | batter hand splits 152 | pitcher HR splits 64 | batter pitch-type 542 | bullpen HR 31
READYAvailableHR model: 0 batter(s) scored | 9 game environment(s) scored | 0 strong/elite batter edge(s)
READYAvailableCore mode: only pitching props are surfaced in ranked plays, tracker saves, and reports

TODAY'S SLATE

DraftKings lines + consensus direction
MatchupTime (ET)Away MLHome MLAway RLHome RLTotalCon ML
Pittsburgh Pirates @ Philadelphia Phillies12:36 PM+109-131+1.5 (-185)-1.5 (+152)O/U 10.0HOMEBet on DK
Cincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers2:11 PM+163-199+1.5 (-143)-1.5 (+119)O/U 7.0HOMEBet on DK
Miami Marlins @ Colorado Rockies3:11 PM-126+104-1.5 (+119)+1.5 (-143)O/U 12.0AWAYBet on DK
Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians6:41 PM-122+102-1.5 (+129)+1.5 (-156)O/U 8.5AWAYBet on DK
St. Louis Cardinals @ Atlanta Braves7:16 PM-102-118-1.5 (+155)+1.5 (-189)O/U 9.0HOMEBet on DK
Tampa Bay Rays @ Kansas City Royals7:41 PM-122+102-1.5 (+123)+1.5 (-149)O/U 10.5AWAYBet on DK
Detroit Tigers @ Texas Rangers8:06 PM+109-131+1.5 (-193)-1.5 (+158)O/U 8.0HOMEBet on DK
Los Angeles Angels @ Seattle Mariners9:41 PM+177-217+1.5 (-131)-1.5 (+109)O/U 7.5HOMEBet on DK
San Diego Padres @ Los Angeles Dodgers10:11 PM+162-198+1.5 (-130)-1.5 (+108)O/U 8.5HOMEBet on DK

GRADE A PLAYS — SWEEP

2 Grade A | 3 Grade B | 12 Review-Only | 0 Pass | 0 Fade

Grade A Best Plays — 2 play(s)

GradeSignalTypeSideGameTime (ET)LineProjOddsBest Book / LineEdge/DiffChecks ✓!✗–Rec
A ⭐ TOP PICK⭐ Top Pick
K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed
K PropWalbert Urena OverANG@MAR9:41 PM4.56.5-119BetOnline Over 4.5 -119 | best price43.5%BEST PLAY
A✅ Best Play
K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed
K PropJacob Misiorowski OverRED@BRE2:11 PM9.511.5+104FanDuel Over 8.5 -154 | alt rescue21.5%BEST PLAY

✓ PASS   ! WARN   ✗ FAIL   – N/A  |  Checks order: Baby Line · Model Edge · Books · Matchup · Role · Game Script

View Full Audit →

V2 FRAMEWORK — RANKED PLAYS

Checks: Baby Line | Model Edge | Books Agree | Matchup | Role/Injury | Game Script - 2 Grade A | 3 Grade B | 12 Review-Only | 1 Top Pick(s)
⭐ TOP PICKS — 100% book consensus (all books agree) + projection 1.5+ over the line
A BEST PLAY ⭐ TOP PICK K Prop — Walbert Urena Over 4.5 (-119) diff 43.5% Bet on DK
Game: Los Angeles Angels @ Seattle Mariners  |  Start: 9:41 PM
Best Book / Line: BetOnline Over 4.5 -119 | best price
Checks:   ► BEST PLAY
▼ Key Factors & Flags (14)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 43.5% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 51.2% / under 48.8%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +1.96K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (3 books): 3/3 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Walbert Urena: K/9 8.9, proj 6.5K over 5.4 IP (season 5.4 IP/GS; recent 5.4 IP/5 start(s); outs market 16.5 outs/5.5 IP (4 books); elite IP floor skipped: leash not established)
  • Savant: whiff% 27.7% | put-away% 22.6% | xwOBA 0.283 | top pitch: Changeup (36% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Seattle Mariners whiff% vs Changeup: 31.5% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.09x)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Walbert Ureña: 6 PA | K% 16.7% | BB% 0.0% | AVG .400 | OPS 1.100
  • Opponent K profile: composite 22.0%, split 18.7%, L7 26.9%, season 23.0% (adj 0.99x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Seattle Mariners) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 7/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 4.5): L5 4/5 (80%) | L10 7/10 (70%) | L20 8/15 (53%) | Season 8/15 (53%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 5.20 | Season Avg 4.60
  • Prop trend: K L10: 7/10 over 4.5; recent avg up +0.60 vs season
  • A-tier gate: strong consensus 100%
⚠ K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed -- A-grade risk note

BEST PLAYS (Grade A)

A BEST PLAY ✅ Best Play K Prop — Jacob Misiorowski Over 9.5 (+104) diff 21.5% Bet on DK
Game: Cincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers  |  Start: 2:11 PM
Best Book / Line: FanDuel Over 8.5 -154 | alt rescue
Checks:   ► BEST PLAY
▼ Key Factors & Flags (15)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 21.5% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): FAIL (over 46.2% / under 53.8%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +2.04K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (3 books): 2/3 OVER -- DK HIGHER (delta +0.67)
  • Jacob Misiorowski: K/9 12.8, proj 11.5K over 6.4 IP (season 6.2 IP/GS; recent 7.0 IP/5 start(s); outs market 18.5 outs/6.2 IP (4 books); elite IP floor)
  • Savant: whiff% 38.2% | put-away% 32.6% | xwOBA 0.228 | top pitch: 4-Seam Fastball (42% whiff, 1% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Cincinnati Reds whiff% vs 4-Seam Fastball: 23.6% (low vs 24.5% avg, adj 0.99x)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Jacob Misiorowski: 17 PA | K% 35.3% | BB% 29.4% | AVG .182 | OPS .652
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.03x from 17 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 25.8%, split 25.8%, L7 23.8%, season 24.9%, active roster 23.3%/6 hitters, BVP 35.3%/17 PA (adj 1.08x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Cincinnati Reds) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster K% 23.3% (6 hitters); active-roster hand mix: 6/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 9.5): L5 1/5 (20%) | L10 4/10 (40%) | L20 6/16 (38%) | Season 6/16 (38%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 9.50 | Season Avg 9.12
  • Prop trend: K L10: 4/10 over 9.5; recent avg up +0.38 vs season
  • A-tier gate: 67% consensus, but diff_pct 21.5% >= 21.3% and raw gap 2.04 >= 1.00
⚠ K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed -- A-grade risk note
▼ Good Adds — Grade B (3 play(s))
▸ K Prop — 3 play(s) (B 3)
B GOOD ADD 🔬 Research Note K Prop — Chase Burns Over 6.5 (-158) diff 35.8% Bet on DK
Game: Cincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers  |  Start: 2:11 PM
Best Book / Line: FanDuel Over 6.5 -148 | best price
Checks: !   ► GOOD ADD
▼ Key Factors & Flags (18)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 35.7% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 57.8% / under 42.2%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +2.32K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (4 books): 3/4 OVER -- IN LINE (delta -0.25)
  • Chase Burns: K/9 11.8, proj 8.8K over 5.7 IP (season 5.7 IP/GS; recent 5.4 IP/5 start(s); outs market 17.5 outs/5.8 IP (3 books); elite IP floor skipped: leash not established)
  • Savant: whiff% 32.6% | put-away% 22.7% | xwOBA 0.270 | top pitch: Slider (52% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Milwaukee Brewers whiff% vs Slider: 31.0% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.09x)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Chase Burns: 25 PA | K% 36.0% | BB% 8.0% | AVG .217 | OPS .671
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.05x from 25 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 22.6%, split 20.9%, L7 20.4%, season 21.1%, BVP 36.0%/25 PA (adj 1.00x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Milwaukee Brewers) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 7/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 6.5): L5 5/5 (100%) | L10 9/10 (90%) | L20 13/16 (81%) | Season 13/16 (81%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 7.30 | Season Avg 7.00
  • Prop trend: K L10: 9/10 over 6.5; recent avg up +0.30 vs season
  • K% trend: support +3.4 ppts (recent 33.9% vs season 30.5%, proj adj +1.7%)
⚠ Matchup: Pitch-type: opp whiffs above avg vs SP top pitch (×1.09) ✓ Over Ks | [!] Opp lineup wRC+ 116 vs RHP — tough platoon matchup
⚠ K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed, juiced K over -158, expected IP 5.7 below A-grade leash -- retained at B
⚠ Heavy juice (-158); break-even ~61%, requires clean execution
⚠ Market status RESEARCH: K Prop Grade B held for recalibration -- derisk posture
B GOOD ADD 🔬 Research Note K Prop — Jared Jones Over 4.5 (-164) diff 26.8% Bet on DK
Game: Pittsburgh Pirates @ Philadelphia Phillies  |  Start: 12:36 PM
Best Book / Line: BetOnline Over 4.5 -154 | best price
Checks: !   ► GOOD ADD
▼ Key Factors & Flags (17)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 26.8% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 58.6% / under 41.4%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +1.20K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (3 books): 3/3 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Jared Jones: K/9 8.6, proj 5.7K over 4.1 IP (season 4.2 IP/GS; recent 4.0 IP/5 start(s); elite IP floor skipped: leash not established)
  • Savant: whiff% 32.3% | put-away% 22.4% | xwOBA 0.338 | top pitch: Changeup (40% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Philadelphia Phillies whiff% vs Changeup: 31.0% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.05x); usage-weighted from raw 1.09x at 18% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Jared Jones: 28 PA | K% 32.1% | BB% 3.6% | AVG .296 | OPS .914
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.06x from 28 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 24.3%, split 22.5%, L7 26.2%, season 23.4%, active roster 22.2%/7 hitters, BVP 32.1%/28 PA (adj 1.04x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Philadelphia Phillies) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster K% 22.2% (7 hitters); active-roster hand mix: 8/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 4.5): L5 0/5 (0%) | L10 1/6 (17%) | L20 1/6 (17%) | Season 1/6 (17%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 4.17 | Season Avg 4.17
  • Prop trend: K L10: 1/6 over 4.5; cold exact-market hit rate
⚠ Matchup: Pitch-type: opp whiffs above avg vs SP top pitch (×1.05) ✓ Over Ks | [!] Opp lineup wRC+ 113 vs RHP — tough platoon matchup
⚠ K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed, juiced K over -164, pitch-type boost on 18% usage pitch, expected IP 4.1 below A-grade leash -- retained at B
⚠ Heavy juice (-164); break-even ~62%, requires clean execution
⚠ Market status RESEARCH: K Prop Grade B held for recalibration -- derisk posture
B GOOD ADD 🔬 Research Note K Prop — Nathan Eovaldi Over 6.5 (-118) diff 19.1% Bet on DK
Game: Detroit Tigers @ Texas Rangers  |  Start: 8:06 PM
Best Book / Line: Fanatics Over 6.5 -110 | best price
Checks: !   ► GOOD ADD
▼ Key Factors & Flags (16)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 19.1% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 51.0% / under 49.0%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +1.24K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (3 books): 2/3 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Nathan Eovaldi: K/9 9.3, proj 7.7K over 6.2 IP (season 6.3 IP/GS; recent 6.2 IP/5 start(s); elite IP floor)
  • Savant: whiff% 29.8% | put-away% 23.4% | xwOBA 0.312 | top pitch: Curveball (38% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Detroit Tigers whiff% vs Curveball: 44.4% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.07x); usage-weighted from raw 1.10x at 21% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Nathan Eovaldi: 34 PA | K% 20.6% | BB% 5.9% | AVG .188 | OPS .579
  • BVP K adjustment: 0.98x from 34 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 22.3%, split 22.9%, L7 21.8%, season 22.9%, BVP 20.6%/34 PA (adj 1.00x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Detroit Tigers) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 6/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 6.5): L5 3/5 (60%) | L10 6/10 (60%) | L20 9/16 (56%) | Season 9/16 (56%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 6.90 | Season Avg 6.31
  • Prop trend: K L10: 6/10 over 6.5; recent avg up +0.59 vs season
⚠ Matchup: Pitch-type: opp whiffs above avg vs SP top pitch (×1.07) ✓ Over Ks | [!] Opp lineup wRC+ 116 vs RHP — tough platoon matchup
⚠ K final QC: opposing lineup not confirmed -- retained at B
⚠ Market status RESEARCH: K Prop Grade B held for recalibration -- derisk posture
▼ Review-Only / Do-Not-Bet Signals (12 signal(s))
▸ K Prop — 9 play(s) (B 4 | C 5)
B ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Dustin May Over 4.5 (-102) diff 41.5% Bet on DK
Game: St. Louis Cardinals @ Atlanta Braves  |  Start: 7:16 PM
Best Book / Line: Fanatics Over 4.5 +100 | best price
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (16)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 41.5% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): FAIL (over 47.6% / under 52.4%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +1.87K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (1 books): 0/1 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Dustin May: K/9 9.2, proj 6.4K over 6.0 IP (season 5.6 IP/GS; recent 5.8 IP/5 start(s); outs market 16.5 outs/5.5 IP (3 books); elite IP floor)
  • Savant: whiff% 22.2% | put-away% 19.4% | xwOBA 0.301 | top pitch: Sweeper (35% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Atlanta Braves whiff% vs Sweeper: 28.8% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.04x); usage-weighted from raw 1.06x at 20% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Dustin May: 82 PA | K% 29.3% | BB% 9.8% | AVG .189 | OPS .633
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.07x from 82 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 21.8%, split 21.3%, L7 20.3%, season 21.1%, active roster 21.0%/7 hitters, BVP 29.3%/82 PA (adj 0.98x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Atlanta Braves) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster K% 21.0% (7 hitters); active-roster hand mix: 7/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 4.5): L5 4/5 (80%) | L10 6/10 (60%) | L20 7/15 (47%) | Season 7/15 (47%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 5.70 | Season Avg 5.13
  • Prop trend: K L10: 6/10 over 4.5; recent avg up +0.57 vs season
  • K% trend: support +8.7 ppts (recent 31.2% vs season 22.5%, proj adj +4.3%)
⚠ Books Disagree: blended market against 47.3% (2 books) | books against us 0% (2 books) — strongly disagree
⚠ ⚠ Books strongly against: blended market against 47.3% (2 books) | books against us 0% (2 books) — strongly disagree — posture note at C
B ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Bryce Miller Over 6.5 (+104) diff 26.2% Bet on DK
Game: Los Angeles Angels @ Seattle Mariners  |  Start: 9:41 PM
Best Book / Line: Fanatics Over 6.5 +105 | best price
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (15)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 26.2% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): FAIL (over 46.2% / under 53.8%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +1.71K vs 1.0 min): PASS
  • Consensus (4 books): 0/4 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Bryce Miller: K/9 10.6, proj 8.2K over 6.0 IP (season 5.8 IP/GS; recent 5.8 IP/5 start(s); outs market 17.5 outs/5.8 IP (3 books); elite IP floor)
  • Savant: whiff% 29.3% | put-away% 20.9% | xwOBA 0.237 | top pitch: Split-Finger (33% whiff, 0% usage)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Bryce Miller: 64 PA | K% 26.6% | BB% 10.9% | AVG .189 | OPS .611
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.04x from 64 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 25.4%, split 25.8%, L7 24.6%, season 24.9%, BVP 26.6%/64 PA (adj 1.07x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Los Angeles Angels) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 5/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 6.5): L5 4/5 (80%) | L10 5/8 (62%) | L20 5/8 (62%) | Season 5/8 (62%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 6.75 | Season Avg 6.75
  • Prop trend: K L10: 5/8 over 6.5
  • K% trend: support +6.5 ppts (recent 39.6% vs season 33.1%, proj adj +3.2%)
⚠ Books Disagree: blended market against 46.7% (5 books) | books against us 0% (5 books) — strongly disagree
⚠ ⚠ Books strongly against: blended market against 46.7% (5 books) | books against us 0% (5 books) — strongly disagree — posture note at C
B MONITOR ◇ Monitor K Prop — Roki Sasaki Over 5.5 (+124) diff 2.2% Bet on DK
Game: San Diego Padres @ Los Angeles Dodgers  |  Start: 10:11 PM
Best Book / Line: FanDuel Over 4.5 -160 | alt rescue
Checks:   ► MONITOR
▼ Key Factors & Flags (16)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 2.2% vs 17% min): FAIL
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): FAIL (over 42.1% / under 57.9%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +0.12K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (3 books): 3/3 OVER -- DK HIGHER (delta +1.00)
  • Roki Sasaki: K/9 9.4, proj 5.6K over 5.2 IP (season 5.1 IP/GS; recent 5.1 IP/5 start(s); outs market 16.2 outs/5.4 IP (4 books); elite IP floor skipped: leash not established)
  • Savant: whiff% 29.2% | put-away% 18.7% | xwOBA 0.331 | top pitch: Slider (40% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: San Diego Padres whiff% vs Slider: 32.4% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.07x); usage-weighted from raw 1.10x at 22% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Roki Sasaki: 19 PA | K% 10.5% | BB% 21.1% | AVG .214 | OPS .993
  • BVP K adjustment: 0.96x from 19 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 19.5%, split 21.7%, L7 17.0%, season 22.7%, BVP 10.5%/19 PA (adj 0.92x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (San Diego Padres) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 4/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 5.5): L5 3/5 (60%) | L10 4/10 (40%) | L20 5/14 (36%) | Season 5/14 (36%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 5.50 | Season Avg 5.14
  • Prop trend: K L10: 4/10 over 5.5; recent avg up +0.36 vs season
  • K% trend: support +3.4 ppts (recent 26.6% vs season 23.2%, proj adj +1.7%)
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 2.2% vs 17% min using selected line 5.5
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 2.2% vs 17% min using selected line 5.5 — posture note at D
B MONITOR ◇ Monitor K Prop — Davis Martin Over 4.5 (-119) diff 0.6% Bet on DK
Game: Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians  |  Start: 6:41 PM
Best Book / Line: DK Over 4.5 -119 | exact
Checks:   ► MONITOR
▼ Key Factors & Flags (15)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 0.6% vs 17% min): FAIL
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 51.2% / under 48.8%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +0.03K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (3 books): 3/3 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Davis Martin: K/9 8.1, proj 4.5K over 5.4 IP (season 5.8 IP/GS; recent 4.9 IP/5 start(s))
  • Savant: whiff% 27.1% | put-away% 20.3% | xwOBA 0.306 | top pitch: Curveball (43% whiff, 0% usage)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Davis Martin: 42 PA | K% 14.3% | BB% 9.5% | AVG .342 | OPS .905
  • BVP K adjustment: 0.92x from 42 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 19.1%, split 16.7%, L7 23.0%, season 21.9%, BVP 14.3%/42 PA (adj 0.91x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Cleveland Guardians) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 9/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 4.5): L5 1/5 (20%) | L10 6/10 (60%) | L20 10/16 (62%) | Season 10/16 (62%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 5.70 | Season Avg 5.62
  • Prop trend: K L10: 6/10 over 4.5
  • K% trend: headwind -7.3 ppts (recent 16.5% vs season 23.8%, proj adj -3.7%)
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 0.6% vs 17% min using selected line 4.5
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 0.6% vs 17% min using selected line 4.5 — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Slade Cecconi Over 3.5 (-159) diff 27.4% Bet on DK
Game: Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians  |  Start: 6:41 PM
Best Book / Line: DK Over 3.5 -159 | exact
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (15)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 27.4% vs 17% min): PASS
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 57.9% / under 42.1%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +0.96K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (2 books): 0/2 OVER -- DK LOWER (delta -1.00)
  • Slade Cecconi: K/9 6.8, proj 4.5K over 5.4 IP (season 5.3 IP/GS; recent 5.6 IP/5 start(s))
  • Savant: whiff% 21.4% | put-away% 16.2% | xwOBA 0.325 | top pitch: Curveball (32% whiff, 0% usage)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Slade Cecconi: 17 PA | K% 29.4% | BB% 11.8% | AVG .333 | OPS 1.212
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.03x from 17 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 22.8%, split 22.1%, L7 19.4%, season 23.9%, active roster 23.3%/6 hitters, BVP 29.4%/17 PA (adj 1.01x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Chicago White Sox) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster K% 23.3% (6 hitters); active-roster hand mix: 8/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 3.5): L5 4/5 (80%) | L10 7/10 (70%) | L20 11/17 (65%) | Season 11/17 (65%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 4.20 | Season Avg 4.12
  • Prop trend: K L10: 7/10 over 3.5; strong exact-market hit rate
⚠ Weak Model Edge: diff_pct 27.4% vs 17% min using selected line 3.5 clears, but raw gap +0.96 <= 1 min
⚠ Books Disagree: blended market against 46.4% (3 books) | books against us 0% (3 books) — strongly disagree
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: diff_pct 27.4% vs 17% min using selected line 3.5 clears, but raw gap +0.96 <= 1 min — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Framber Valdez Under 5.5 (-153) diff 14.4% Bet on DK
Game: Detroit Tigers @ Texas Rangers  |  Start: 8:06 PM
Best Book / Line: FanDuel Under 5.5 -142 | best price
Checks: !!   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (16)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 14.4% vs 17% min): FAIL
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 42.9% / under 57.1%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff -0.79K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (2 books): 0/2 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Framber Valdez: K/9 7.3, proj 4.7K over 5.6 IP (season 5.6 IP/GS; recent 5.6 IP/5 start(s))
  • Savant: whiff% 21.1% | put-away% 16.8% | xwOBA 0.321 | top pitch: Curveball (31% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Texas Rangers whiff% vs Curveball: 20.9% (low vs 24.5% avg, adj 0.95x); usage-weighted from raw 0.95x at 28% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Framber Valdez: 122 PA | K% 34.4% | BB% 3.3% | AVG .197 | OPS .520
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.08x from 122 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 23.0%, split 21.7%, L7 22.4%, season 22.5%, active roster 19.8%/7 hitters, BVP 34.4%/122 PA (adj 1.01x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Texas Rangers) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster K% 19.8% (7 hitters); active-roster hand mix: 7/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Under 5.5): L5 3/5 (60%) | L10 7/10 (70%) | L20 12/17 (71%) | Season 12/17 (71%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 4.50 | Season Avg 4.53
  • Prop trend: K L10: 7/10 under 5.5; strong exact-market hit rate
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 14.4% vs 17% min using selected line 5.5
⚠ Matchup: Opp lineup wRC+ 108 vs LHP — neutral | [!] Pitch-type: opp whiffs below avg vs SP top pitch (×0.95) ✗ Over Ks
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 14.4% vs 17% min using selected line 5.5 — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Alan Rangel Over 4.5 (+123) diff 4.0% Bet on DK
Game: Pittsburgh Pirates @ Philadelphia Phillies  |  Start: 12:36 PM
Best Book / Line: DK Over 4.5 +123 | exact
Checks: !   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (16)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 4.0% vs 17% min): FAIL
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): FAIL (over 42.3% / under 57.7%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +0.18K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (4 books): 0/4 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Alan Rangel: K/9 9.1, proj 4.7K over 4.8 IP (default 5.8 IP; recent 4.0 IP/3 start(s); outs market 14.5 outs/4.8 IP (4 books); elite IP floor skipped: leash not established)
  • Savant: whiff% 19.7% | put-away% 19.6% | xwOBA 0.270 | top pitch: Changeup (42% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Pittsburgh Pirates whiff% vs Changeup: 30.7% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.08x)
  • BVP (active roster) vs Alan Rangel: 7 PA | K% 14.3% | BB% 0.0% | AVG .286 | OPS 1.143
  • Opponent K profile: composite 24.6%, split 21.6%, L7 30.5%, season 24.1% (adj 1.05x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Pittsburgh Pirates) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 6/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 4.5): L5 1/3 (33%) | L10 1/3 (33%) | L20 1/3 (33%) | Season 1/3 (33%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 4.33 | Season Avg 4.33
  • Prop trend: K L10: 1/3 over 4.5
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.0% vs 17% min using selected line 4.5
⚠ Books Disagree: blended market against 43.3% (5 books) | books against us 0% (5 books) — strongly disagree
⚠ Matchup: Pitch-type: opp whiffs above avg vs SP top pitch (×1.08) ✓ Over Ks | [!] Opp lineup wRC+ 117 vs RHP — tough platoon matchup
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.0% vs 17% min using selected line 4.5 — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Ian Seymour Over 4.5 (-105) diff 4.0% Bet on DK
Game: Tampa Bay Rays @ Kansas City Royals  |  Start: 7:41 PM
Best Book / Line: DK Over 4.5 -105 | exact
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (16)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 4.0% vs 17% min): FAIL
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): FAIL (over 48.3% / under 51.7%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff +0.18K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (2 books): 1/2 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Ian Seymour: K/9 9.0, proj 4.7K over 4.0 IP (season 3.7 IP/GS; recent 4.1 IP/5 start(s); elite IP floor skipped: leash not established)
  • Savant: whiff% 27.6% | put-away% 18.6% | xwOBA 0.286 | top pitch: Sweeper (40% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Kansas City Royals whiff% vs Sweeper: 32.3% (high vs 24.5% avg, adj 1.08x); usage-weighted from raw 1.10x at 23% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Ian Seymour: 22 PA | K% 31.8% | BB% 4.5% | AVG .000 | OPS .045
  • BVP K adjustment: 1.04x from 22 roster PA
  • Opponent K profile: composite 22.7%, split 19.7%, L7 25.7%, season 21.1%, active roster 21.4%/6 hitters, BVP 31.8%/22 PA (adj 1.00x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Kansas City Royals) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster K% 21.4% (6 hitters); active-roster hand mix: 7/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Over 4.5): L5 2/5 (40%) | L10 2/10 (20%) | L20 2/20 (10%) | Season 2/30 (7%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 2.60 | Season Avg 1.73
  • Prop trend: K L10: 2/10 over 4.5; recent avg up +0.87 vs season
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.0% vs 17% min using selected line 4.5
⚠ Books Disagree: blended market against 49.2% (3 books) | split consensus 50% (3 books)
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.0% vs 17% min using selected line 4.5 — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk K Prop — Stephen Kolek Under 3.5 (-164) diff 3.9% Bet on DK
Game: Tampa Bay Rays @ Kansas City Royals  |  Start: 7:41 PM
Best Book / Line: DK Under 3.5 -164 | exact
Checks: !!   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (15)
  • Trifecta 1 (DIFF% 3.9% vs 17% min): FAIL
  • Trifecta 2 (market agrees): PASS (over 41.4% / under 58.6%)
  • Trifecta 3 (Abs diff -0.14K vs 1.0 min): FAIL
  • Consensus (1 books): 0/1 OVER -- IN LINE (delta +0.00)
  • Stephen Kolek: K/9 6.9, proj 3.4K over 5.5 IP (season 5.8 IP/GS; recent 5.1 IP/5 start(s))
  • Savant: whiff% 19.0% | put-away% 18.2% | xwOBA 0.304 | top pitch: Slider (43% whiff, 0% usage)
  • Pitch-type matchup: Tampa Bay Rays whiff% vs Slider: 20.5% (low vs 24.5% avg, adj 0.97x); usage-weighted from raw 0.94x at 17% usage
  • BVP (active roster) vs Stephen Kolek: 6 PA | K% 16.7% | BB% 0.0% | AVG .500 | OPS 1.167
  • Opponent K profile: composite 16.3%, split 16.5%, L7 13.4%, season 18.8% (adj 0.84x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Tampa Bay Rays) not yet posted — using team K tendencies, handedness splits & season stats; active-roster hand mix: 7/13 bats with platoon edge
  • Prop history (pitcher_strikeouts Under 3.5): L5 2/5 (40%) | L10 5/9 (56%) | L20 5/9 (56%) | Season 5/9 (56%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 3.78 | Season Avg 3.78
  • Prop trend: K L10: 5/9 under 3.5
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 3.9% vs 17% min using selected line 3.5
⚠ Matchup: [!] Opp lineup wRC+ 117 vs RHP — tough platoon matchup
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 3.9% vs 17% min using selected line 3.5 — posture note at D
▸ Pitcher Outs — 3 play(s) (C 3)
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk Pitcher Outs — Jacob Misiorowski Over 18.5 (+147) diff 15.6% Bet on DK
Game: Cincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers  |  Start: 2:11 PM
Best Book / Line: Bovada Direct Over 18.5 +150 | best price
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (21)
  • Proj 21.393 vs line 18.5 | DIFF% 15.6% (min 10%)
  • Basis: baseline 6.2 IP (season 6.2 IP/GS, weight 100%); leash adj +0.2 IP (recent 7.0 IP/5 start(s), weight 20%); quality adj +0.7 IP (xFIP 2.19 vs lg 4.20); projected 7.0 IP
  • DK books agree: NO (over 37.9% / under 62.1%)
  • Consensus (3 books): 0/3 OVER -- IN LINE
  • Opp batting adj: +0.1 outs (Opp batting (Cincinnati Reds): wRC+ 97) | Pitch-count adj: -0.4 outs | Leash assessment adj: +0.7 outs (deep leash, high pitch-count proxy 117, patient opponent)
  • Outs projection components: baseline 6.2 IP | leash +0.2 IP | quality +0.7 IP
  • Pitcher assessment: quality season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand | leash deep | expected K IP 6.3 | pitch-count proxy 117
  • BVP (active roster) vs Jacob Misiorowski: 17 PA | K% 35.3% | BB% 29.4% | AVG .182 | OPS .652
  • Opponent K profile: composite 26.2%, split 25.8%, L7 23.8%, season 24.9%, BVP 35.3%/17 PA (adj 1.09x)
  • Opponent BB profile: composite 12.5%, split 9.4%, L7 9.3%, season 9.8%, BVP 29.4%/17 PA (adj 1.24x)
  • Outs leash: deep-start support: season leash 6.2 IP/GS
  • Outs leash: deep-start support: recent leash 7.0 IP/start
  • Outs leash: hook risk: patient opponent BB% 12.5%
  • Outs leash: deep-start support: assessment deep leash
  • Outs leash: hook risk: assessment patient opponent BB% 9.8%
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Cincinnati Reds) not yet posted — using team contact profile & season stats
  • Prop history (pitcher_outs Over 18.5): L5 3/5 (60%) | L10 5/10 (50%) | L20 5/16 (31%) | Season 5/16 (31%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 19.90 | Season Avg 18.56
  • Prop trend: Pitcher Outs L10: 5/10 over 18.5; recent avg up +1.34 vs season
⚠ Weak Model Edge: diff_pct 15.6% vs 10% min using selected line 18.5 clears, but raw gap +2.89 <= 3 min
⚠ Books Disagree: blended market against 39.3% (4 books) | books against us 0% (4 books) — strongly disagree
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: diff_pct 15.6% vs 10% min using selected line 18.5 clears, but raw gap +2.89 <= 3 min — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk Pitcher Outs — Bryce Miller Over 17.5 (-134) diff 4.1% Bet on DK
Game: Los Angeles Angels @ Seattle Mariners  |  Start: 9:41 PM
Best Book / Line: DK Over 17.5 -134 | exact
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (15)
  • Proj 18.224 vs line 17.5 | DIFF% 4.1% (min 10%)
  • Basis: baseline 5.6 IP (season 5.8 IP/GS, weight 70%); leash adj +0.1 IP (recent 5.8 IP/5 start(s), weight 20%); quality adj +0.5 IP (xFIP 3.30 vs lg 4.20); projected 6.1 IP
  • DK books agree: YES (over 53.5% / under 46.5%)
  • Consensus (2 books): 2/2 OVER -- IN LINE
  • Opp batting adj: +0.0 outs (Opp batting (Los Angeles Angels): wRC+ 99) | Leash assessment adj: +0.0 outs (neutral leash)
  • Outs projection components: baseline 5.6 IP | leash +0.1 IP | quality +0.5 IP
  • Pitcher assessment: quality season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand | leash normal | expected K IP 6.0 | pitch-count proxy 97
  • BVP (active roster) vs Bryce Miller: 64 PA | K% 26.6% | BB% 10.9% | AVG .189 | OPS .611
  • Opponent K profile: composite 25.4%, split 25.8%, L7 24.6%, season 24.9%, BVP 26.6%/64 PA (adj 1.07x)
  • Opponent BB profile: composite 9.1%, split 9.5%, L7 7.8%, season 8.8%, BVP 10.9%/64 PA (adj 1.04x)
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Los Angeles Angels) not yet posted — using team contact profile & season stats
  • Prop history (pitcher_outs Over 17.5): L5 2/5 (40%) | L10 2/8 (25%) | L20 2/8 (25%) | Season 2/8 (25%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 17.12 | Season Avg 17.12
  • Prop trend: Pitcher Outs L10: 2/8 over 17.5; cold exact-market hit rate
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.1% vs 10% min using selected line 17.5
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.1% vs 10% min using selected line 17.5 — posture note at D
C ALT / DERISK ↘ Alt / Derisk Pitcher Outs — Chase Burns Over 17.5 (-139) diff 1.9% Bet on DK
Game: Cincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers  |  Start: 2:11 PM
Best Book / Line: Caesars Over 17.5 -137 | best price
Checks:   ► ALT / DERISK
▼ Key Factors & Flags (17)
  • Proj 17.828000000000003 vs line 17.5 | DIFF% 1.9% (min 10%)
  • Basis: baseline 5.7 IP (season 5.7 IP/GS, weight 100%); leash adj -0.1 IP (recent 5.4 IP/5 start(s), weight 20%); quality adj +0.5 IP (xFIP 3.20 vs lg 4.20); projected 6.2 IP
  • DK books agree: YES (over 54.4% / under 45.6%)
  • Consensus (2 books): 2/2 OVER -- IN LINE
  • Opp batting adj: -0.1 outs (Opp batting (Milwaukee Brewers): wRC+ 102) | Pitch-count adj: -0.4 outs | Leash assessment adj: -0.2 outs (patient opponent)
  • Outs projection components: baseline 5.7 IP | leash -0.1 IP | quality +0.5 IP
  • Pitcher assessment: quality season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand | leash normal | expected K IP 5.7 | pitch-count proxy 91
  • BVP (active roster) vs Chase Burns: 25 PA | K% 36.0% | BB% 8.0% | AVG .217 | OPS .671
  • Opponent K profile: composite 22.6%, split 20.9%, L7 20.4%, season 21.1%, BVP 36.0%/25 PA (adj 1.00x)
  • Opponent BB profile: composite 10.8%, split 11.9%, L7 10.7%, season 10.8%, BVP 8.0%/25 PA (adj 1.14x)
  • Outs leash: hook risk: patient opponent BB% 10.8%
  • Outs leash: hook risk: assessment patient opponent BB% 10.8%
  • Opp lineup: Opposing lineup (Milwaukee Brewers) not yet posted — using team contact profile & season stats
  • Prop history (pitcher_outs Over 17.5): L5 2/5 (40%) | L10 6/10 (60%) | L20 9/16 (56%) | Season 9/16 (56%) | H2H/BVP N/A | Recent Avg 17.30 | Season Avg 17.19
  • Prop trend: Pitcher Outs L10: 6/10 over 17.5
⚠ Weak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 1.9% vs 10% min using selected line 17.5
⚠ ⚠ Model edge fail: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 1.9% vs 10% min using selected line 17.5 — posture note at D

GAME BETS — DETAIL

0 bet(s) above 15% edge threshold

No bets meet the threshold today.

F5 BETS — DETAIL

0 bet(s) above 8% edge threshold

No bets meet the threshold today.

NRFI — NO RUN FIRST INNING

Score threshold: 7.7+ | SP 40% / K% 35% / Off 25%

No NRFI/YRFI model signals meet the score threshold today.

HR LIKELIHOOD MODEL

Ranked by true HR chance first: recent form, matchup, lineup, park/weather, and game context lead; odds/edge are context

HR model skipped or unavailable for this run.

NO-HR MODEL — POISSON GAME ANALYSIS

Poisson model &mdash; P(no HR)&ge;20% or P(under 1.5 HR)&ge;52.2% for a model signal

No games scored — model may have been skipped or data unavailable.

SAVANT PITCH QUALITY DIAGNOSTICS

18 pitcher(s) with public-data pitch-quality diagnostics
PitcherGameOverallWhiffContactArsenalTop PitchNotes / Data Gaps
Jacob MisiorowskiMilwaukee Brewers vs Cincinnati Reds86.892.793.554-Seam Fastball (42% whiff, 64% usage)Savant whiff 38.2%, put-away 32.6%, xwOBA 0.228, arsenal coverage 5 pitch type(s)
Bryce MillerSeattle Mariners vs Los Angeles Angels72.063.189.07Split-Finger (33% whiff, 22% usage)Savant whiff 29.3%, put-away 20.9%, xwOBA 0.237, arsenal coverage 7 pitch type(s)
Chase BurnsCincinnati Reds vs Milwaukee Brewers69.371.572.53Slider (52% whiff, 37% usage)Savant whiff 32.6%, put-away 22.7%, xwOBA 0.270, arsenal coverage 3 pitch type(s)
Walbert UreñaLos Angeles Angels vs Seattle Mariners62.561.666.04Changeup (36% whiff, 32% usage)Savant whiff 27.7%, put-away 22.6%, xwOBA 0.283, arsenal coverage 4 pitch type(s)
Ian SeymourTampa Bay Rays vs Kansas City Royals59.357.564.57Sweeper (40% whiff, 23% usage)Savant whiff 27.6%, put-away 18.6%, xwOBA 0.286, arsenal coverage 7 pitch type(s)
Nathan EovaldiTexas Rangers vs Detroit Tigers57.966.751.56Curveball (38% whiff, 21% usage)Savant whiff 29.8%, put-away 23.4%, xwOBA 0.312, arsenal coverage 6 pitch type(s)
Jared JonesPittsburgh Pirates vs Philadelphia Phillies55.570.838.54Changeup (40% whiff, 18% usage)Savant whiff 32.3%, put-away 22.4%, xwOBA 0.338, arsenal coverage 4 pitch type(s)
Davis MartinChicago White Sox vs Cleveland Guardians54.858.254.56Curveball (43% whiff, 13% usage)Savant whiff 27.1%, put-away 20.3%, xwOBA 0.306, arsenal coverage 6 pitch type(s)
Alan RangelPhiladelphia Phillies vs Pittsburgh Pirates54.642.772.54Changeup (42% whiff, 36% usage)Savant whiff 19.7%, put-away 19.6%, xwOBA 0.270, arsenal coverage 4 pitch type(s)
Roki SasakiLos Angeles Dodgers vs San Diego Padres51.960.742.03Slider (40% whiff, 22% usage)Savant whiff 29.2%, put-away 18.7%, xwOBA 0.331, arsenal coverage 3 pitch type(s)
Dustin MaySt. Louis Cardinals vs Atlanta Braves51.447.657.06Sweeper (35% whiff, 20% usage)Savant whiff 22.2%, put-away 19.4%, xwOBA 0.301, arsenal coverage 6 pitch type(s)
Stephen KolekKansas City Royals vs Tampa Bay Rays48.239.955.56Slider (43% whiff, 17% usage)Savant whiff 19.0%, put-away 18.2%, xwOBA 0.304, arsenal coverage 6 pitch type(s)
Hurston WaldrepAtlanta Braves vs St. Louis Cardinals46.175.021.04Split-Finger (50% whiff, 27% usage)Savant whiff 31.8%, put-away 27.7%, xwOBA 0.373, arsenal coverage 4 pitch type(s)
Framber ValdezDetroit Tigers vs Texas Rangers44.642.647.05Curveball (31% whiff, 28% usage)Savant whiff 21.1%, put-away 16.8%, xwOBA 0.321, arsenal coverage 5 pitch type(s)
Slade CecconiCleveland Guardians vs Chicago White Sox44.142.645.07Curveball (32% whiff, 15% usage)Savant whiff 21.4%, put-away 16.2%, xwOBA 0.325, arsenal coverage 7 pitch type(s)
Ryan GustoMiami Marlins vs Colorado Rockies38.342.033.574-Seam Fastball (22% whiff, 26% usage)Savant whiff 20.1%, put-away 18.2%, xwOBA 0.348, arsenal coverage 7 pitch type(s)
Michael LorenzenColorado Rockies vs Miami Marlins36.840.828.07Changeup (32% whiff, 19% usage)Savant whiff 20.1%, put-away 16.9%, xwOBA 0.359, arsenal coverage 7 pitch type(s)
Randy VásquezSan Diego Padres vs Los Angeles Dodgers25.639.19.074-Seam Fastball (22% whiff, 32% usage)Savant whiff 20.9%, put-away 13.6%, xwOBA 0.397, arsenal coverage 7 pitch type(s)

Diagnostic only. This is a free Savant-derived pitch-quality layer, not Pitcher List PLV/PLA, and it does not change recommendations.

PITCHER ASSESSMENT DIAGNOSTICS

18 starter assessment(s) emitted by Pitcher Engine
PitcherTeamHandSeason K%Recent IPSeason IPK IPPitch CtLeashSavantContactHR VulnQualityFlags / Notes
Hurston WaldrepAtlanta Braves vs St. Louis CardinalsR22.6%--5.896unknownfull21.0079.00season+savant+savant_quality+handrecent_form_unavailable
Davis MartinChicago White Sox vs Cleveland GuardiansR21.2%4.95.85.682shortfull54.5045.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 4.9 IP/start, patient opponent BB% 9.8%
Chase BurnsCincinnati Reds vs Milwaukee BrewersR31.7%5.45.75.791normalfull72.5027.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handpatient opponent BB% 10.8%
Slade CecconiCleveland Guardians vs Chicago White SoxR17.8%5.65.35.494normalfull45.0055.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand-
Michael LorenzenColorado Rockies vs Miami MarlinsR18.1%4.74.84.779shortfull28.0072.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 4.7 IP/start
Framber ValdezDetroit Tigers vs Texas RangersL18.6%5.65.65.694normalfull47.0053.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand-
Stephen KolekKansas City Royals vs Tampa Bay RaysR17.9%5.15.85.686shortfull55.5044.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 5.1 IP/start, patient opponent BB% 9.6%, low-K contact opponent 18.8%
Walbert UreñaLos Angeles Angels vs Seattle MarinersR22.6%5.45.45.491normalfull66.0034.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand-
Roki SasakiLos Angeles Dodgers vs San Diego PadresR24.3%5.15.15.186shortfull42.0058.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 5.1 IP/start
Ryan GustoMiami Marlins vs Colorado RockiesR20.8%3.53.74.559shortfull33.5066.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 3.5 IP/start
Jacob MisiorowskiMilwaukee Brewers vs Cincinnati RedsR37.8%7.06.26.3117deepfull93.506.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handpatient opponent BB% 9.8%
Alan RangelPhiladelphia Phillies vs Pittsburgh PiratesR23.8%4.0-5.467shortfull72.5027.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 4.0 IP/start
Jared JonesPittsburgh Pirates vs Philadelphia PhilliesR22.1%4.04.24.667shortfull38.5061.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 4.0 IP/start
Randy VásquezSan Diego Padres vs Los Angeles DodgersR15.4%4.05.24.967shortfull9.0091.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 4.0 IP/start, patient opponent BB% 10.5%
Bryce MillerSeattle Mariners vs Los Angeles AngelsR32.4%5.85.86.097normalfull89.0011.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand-
Dustin MaySt. Louis Cardinals vs Atlanta BravesR25.6%5.85.66.097normalfull57.0043.00season+recent+savant+savant_quality+hand-
Ian SeymourTampa Bay Rays vs Kansas City RoyalsL24.0%4.13.74.969shortfull64.5035.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handrecent leash 4.1 IP/start
Nathan EovaldiTexas Rangers vs Detroit TigersR25.0%6.26.36.3104deepfull51.5048.50season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handpatient opponent BB% 9.6%

Diagnostics only. These values are exposed for review and do not change recommendations yet.

PITCHER OUTS RESEARCH GATE

3/3 candidate(s) held from actionable output
PitcherSideGameLineProjGapEdge / DIFF%GradeRecStatusLeashK IPPitch CtQualityGate Reason
Jacob MisiorowskiJacob Misiorowski OverCincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers18.521.42.915.6%CALT_DERISKresearchdeep6.3117season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handWeak Model Edge: diff_pct 15.6% vs 10% min using selected line 18.5 clears, but raw gap +2.89 <= 3 min
Bryce MillerBryce Miller OverLos Angeles Angels @ Seattle Mariners17.518.20.74.1%CALT_DERISKresearchnormal6.097season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handWeak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 4.1% vs 10% min using selected line 17.5
Chase BurnsChase Burns OverCincinnati Reds @ Milwaukee Brewers17.517.80.31.9%CALT_DERISKresearchnormal5.791season+recent+savant+savant_quality+handWeak Model Edge: Insufficient model edge — diff_pct 1.9% vs 10% min using selected line 17.5

QC summary only. Pitcher Outs remains research-only until the assessment gate is validated.

REFERENCE GUIDE

Column definitions, model notes, and sizing rules

V2 Framework — How the Report is Structured

Every bet candidate — regardless of market — passes through the same six-check evaluation engine before appearing in the report. The engine produces a letter grade (A–F) and a recommendation tier. The top of the report shows your actionable plays; the full sweep table below it shows every candidate evaluated that day so you can audit the model's reasoning.

SectionWhat it shows
V2 Ranked PlaysGrade A (Best Play) and Grade B (Good Add) candidates with full detail — check bar, key factors, risk flags, and contradiction flags
Full Candidate SweepEvery evaluated bet in one compact table grouped by grade tier. Use this to understand why a play was filtered out.
Market Trust TiersSettled tracker performance by market, including season and recent windows used to support trust tiers.
Market Promotion CriteriaThe concrete blockers a market must clear before moving from paused to research, watch, or trusted.
Diagnostic vs Recommendation ImpactRuntime source of truth for whether a signal is active, held, research-only, or configuration-needed.
Data ReadinessInput availability for the run, including lineups, active-roster hitter context, weather, BVP, pitch-type data, market health, and player context.
Today's SlateDraftKings reference lines for all games
Detail SectionsMarket detail, diagnostics, and research sections below the V2 ranked plays.

V2 Six-Check System

Each check returns PASS ✓, WARN !, FAIL ✗, or N/A –. Checks that need unavailable data degrade to N/A without penalising the grade. Two points for PASS, one for WARN or N/A, zero for FAIL.

#CheckWhat it evaluatesPASS condition
1Baby LineLine size, batter opportunity, run-line cushionNo baby-line flags, adequate PA opportunity, RL cushion ≥0.2 runs
2Model EdgeProjection vs selected/displayed sportsbook lineEdge ≥ threshold for the market type
3Books AgreeBlended market direction + consensus lean % across available booksBlended market agrees with model AND ≥55% of consensus books lean same side
4MatchupPark factor, weather, pitcher handedness vs lineup splitsPark/weather support the bet direction; platoon matchup neutral or favorable
5Role / InjuryConfirmed lineup spot, injury flags, workload concernsNo injury flags; lineup confirmed in a favorable spot
6Game ScriptCombined park × weather run environment; run-line margin vs spreadEnvironment supports bet direction; RL margin cushion ≥0.5 runs

Grades & Recommendations

GradeScoreRecommendationWhen to bet
A10–12, 0 FAILsBEST PLAYCore play — all six checks aligned
B7–9, ≤1 FAILGOOD ADDStrong play with minor caveats
C4–6PASSThin — skip unless you have a strong personal read
D2–3 or model edge FAILPASSDo not bet — weak signal
F0–1HARD FADEConsider betting the other side

Hard override: a Model Edge FAIL always caps at Grade D regardless of other checks. Books Strongly Disagree caps at Grade C.

Final Signals

Final Signal combines the model grade with market trust. Top Pick remains the rare flagship rule, while other signals show whether a strong model read is trusted, watch-listed, research-only, or paused.

SignalMeaning
⭐ TOP PICKExisting Top Pick rule: 100% book consensus plus a raw projection cushion of at least 1.5 units.
✅ Best PlayTrusted market with an A-grade model signal.
👀 Strong WatchWatch-stage market with an A-grade model signal; visible but not promoted to Top Pick.
🔬 Research LeadResearch-stage market with an A-grade model signal; diagnostics only until validation clears.
⛔ Paused SignalPaused market with an A/B model signal; shown so the signal is not lost, but not actionable.

Market Promotion Lifecycle

Markets move from paused to research to watch to trusted only when settled evidence clears the criteria shown in Market Promotion Criteria. This keeps a market from getting stuck in research without a clear path forward.

StageRecommendation behaviorEvidence needed
TrustedEligible for normal Best Play / Good Add output.Continue passing season and recent market-health checks.
WatchVisible as a valid signal, but not treated as fully trusted.Season sample, positive P&L, recent sample, recent P&L, and Grade A performance.
ResearchScored and audited, but held from actionable output until validation clears.Forward sample, positive season signal, recent win-rate support, and Grade A validation.
PausedShadow-only. No actionable recommendations.A redesigned/component signal plus settled validation before returning to research.

Raw edge is an uncalibrated ranking/debug value. The model grade and market stage should be read together.

Contradiction Flags ⚡

When two recommended plays on the same game send opposing run-environment signals, a ⚡ contradiction flag is added to both plays. The bet is not removed — it is flagged so you can decide consciously whether the conflict makes sense.

PatternWhy it conflicts
Total Over + NRFIHigh-run game expectation vs no runs in the 1st inning
Total Under + YRFILow-run game expectation vs runs scoring in the 1st
K Prop Over + YRFIPitcher dominates yet run scores early
Batter Overs + Total UnderPlayer production expected but game total is low
Outs Over + K Under (same SP)Long outing projected but few strikeouts — projection inconsistency

API Quota Bar

ElementMeaning
Progress barVisual fill of monthly Odds API usage
used / totalRequests consumed vs. your monthly cap — each run costs ~1 request per game (combined market fetch)

Today's Slate

ColumnMeaning
Away ML / Home MLDraftKings moneyline. −150 = bet $150 to win $100 • +130 = bet $100 to win $130
Away RL / Home RLRun line (always ±1.5) with its odds. −1.5(−110) = team must win by 2+
TotalOver/Under line (e.g. O/U 8.5)
Con MLConsensus moneyline direction — which side the majority of other books (FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, etc.) favor

Game Bets — Column Definitions

ColumnMeaning
GradeV2 Framework grade (A–D) — driven by the six-check scoring system. A/B rows are highlighted. See Grade Scale below.
TypeMoneyline, Run Line, Total Over/Under, F5 ML, F5 Total
DK OddsDraftKings price for that side
ImpliedDK implied probability after vig removal
ModelWin probability our model calculates independently
EdgeModel% − Implied%. Min 15% to surface a game bet.
EV/$100Expected profit per $100 wagered: (win_prob × profit) − (loss_prob × $100)
BooksNumber of consensus books with data for this market (ML/RL: directional lean; Total: line coverage). ≥3 = full check, 2 = capped at B/C, <2 = Check 3 fails.

How the Model Works — The Simple Version

The model is asking one question: does DraftKings have the wrong price on this game?

It independently calculates how likely each team is to win by grading two things: how good is today's starting pitcher (xFIP vs league average) and how good is the opposing lineup (wRC+ vs league average). It adds a small home-field bonus, blends in the pitcher's last 5 starts (35% weight), then converts the result to a win probability. That probability is compared to what DraftKings implies. If the gap is ≥15%, it surfaces as a bet.

The model caps at ~68–70% win probability even in extreme mismatches — baseball is unpredictable and overconfident models lose money. Missing data automatically reduces confidence and bet sizing.

How the Model Works — Win Probability (Technical)

For every game the model builds a score differential from three inputs, then converts it to a win probability using a logistic (S-curve) function. Here is each step:

StepWhat it calculatesData sourceWeight
1. Pitching edge How much better or worse each SP is vs. the league-average xFIP of 4.20.
home_pitch = (4.20 − home_xFIP) / 4.20
pitch_edge = home_pitch − away_pitch
A positive number means the home SP is above average relative to the away SP.
FanGraphs xFIP (direct API call) — the best early-season ERA predictor because it removes defense and luck 50%
2. Offense edge How much stronger or weaker each lineup is vs. the league-average wRC+ of 100.
home_bat = (home_wRC+ − 100) / 100
off_edge = home_bat − away_bat
A team with wRC+ 110 contributes +0.10; one at 90 contributes −0.10.
MLB Stats API team batting — OPS converted to wRC+ via (OPS / 0.720) × 100 35%
3. Home field Fixed constant added to the home team's side every game. Historical MLB average home-field effect +4%
4. Score diff score_diff = 0.50 × pitch_edge + 0.35 × off_edge + 0.04 Combined signal driving the probability below
5. Win probability home_win_prob = logistic(1.5 × score_diff)
The logistic scale of 1.5 keeps the model from being overconfident — even an extreme mismatch caps out around 68–70%.
Standard logistic sigmoid: 1 / (1 + e−x)

Recent Form Blending

Season stats are stable but slow to react. Recent form can signal a pitcher heating up or falling apart. The model blends both:

SourceWeightStats blended
Season-to-date (FanGraphs)65%xFIP, ERA, WHIP, K%, K/9
Last 5 starts (MLB Stats API game logs)35%ERA, WHIP, K%, K/9 — computed from raw game log totals

xFIP is season-only (requires full-season HR data to normalize). ERA trend from recent starts adjusts the blended ERA implicitly.

How the Model Works — Expected Run Total

For Over/Under bets the model projects a total runs scored using a similar framework:

StepCalculation
Base2 × 4.5 league-average runs/game = 9.0
SP factorAverage of (home xFIP / 4.20) and (away xFIP / 4.20). Uses xFIP for consistency with the win-probability model — ERA includes luck and inflates totals for pitchers who got unlucky.
Offense factorAverage of (home wRC+ / 100) and (away wRC+ / 100).
Raw total9.0 × (0.60 × SP factor + 0.40 × off_factor)
Park adjustmentRaw total × venue run factor (e.g. Coors 1.32, Oracle Park 0.92). Blended at 60% weight: 0.40 × raw + 0.60 × park_adjusted

Weather adjustments layer on top: headwind (N/NW/NE) × 0.93 on run total • tailwind (S/SW/SE) × 1.08 • cold (≤45°F) × 0.96

Signal Usage Matrix

The Diagnostic vs Recommendation Impact table near the top of the report is the source of truth for whether each market or diagnostic layer affects recommendations, only gates recommendations, is research-only, or needs configuration. A signal being visible in diagnostics does not automatically mean it changes grades or picks.

Usage typeMeaning
Active recommendation marketTrusted or watch-stage markets can appear in ranked plays according to the V2 framework and market trust rules.
Held / gated marketResearch markets can be scored for audit, but are held from actionable output until validation clears.
Shadow researchPaused markets such as HRR component research emit diagnostics only; they do not create recommendations.
Diagnostic-only sourceContext layers such as player splits and AI review explain the run but do not change thresholds, grades, or tracker saves unless a future validation PR explicitly activates them.

Runtime Diagnostic Components

ComponentPurposeRecommendation impact today
PitcherAssessmentStarter-level hand, K%, innings, estimated pitch count, leash risk, Savant support, contact suppression, HR vulnerability, and data gaps.Feeds pitcher and batter context. It is visible in diagnostics; individual fields affect picks only where the engine explicitly consumes them.
Savant Pitch QualityFree public-data pitch-quality scores built from Savant summary and arsenal fields: whiff, put-away, xwOBA, run value, pitch mix depth, and top pitch.Diagnostic-only. It replaces the retired premium PLV path for review visibility but does not change recommendations.
Pitcher Outs Research GateShows pitcher outs candidates, projected gap, leash, expected K innings, pitch count, assessment quality, and hold reason.Research/held. Pitcher Outs remains out of actionable output until the gate validates.
HRR Component ResearchBreaks Batter H+R+RBI into hit, run, and RBI components with uncertainty and support notes.Shadow-only. HRR remains paused and cannot become actionable from the old composite threshold.
Player ContextHome/away, day/night, recent-return, role, usage, workload diagnostics, and pre-lineup active-roster hitter pools.Missing split data is neutral. Real role, injury, or workload concerns may surface as risk context.
AI ReviewOptional post-run review of recent settled results and model behavior.Advisory only. It cannot change picks, thresholds, tracker saves, or market status.

Premium Pitcher List PLV

Premium Pitcher List PLV/PLA enrichment is intentionally retired from daily output because no free live 2026 aggregate export is available. The optional loader remains for local experiments only. The replacement path is the Savant Pitch Quality diagnostic section, which uses public Statcast/Savant inputs.

Data Readiness States

StateImpactHow to read it
READYAvailableThe input loaded and is available to the relevant model or diagnostic section.
LATE DATANon-blockingThe feed usually appears later on game day, such as confirmed lineups or home-plate umpires.
PARTIALNon-blockingThe source returned usable rows, but one sub-market or optional slice is missing. Available pieces still support the run.
MARKET UNAVAILABLENon-blockingThe odds/source returned no usable rows for that market in this run. Other markets can still run normally.
SOURCE MISSINGNon-blocking unless marked otherwiseThe configured source is unavailable, sparse, or missing. Treat as a data gap, not an automatic bet risk.
LIMITEDNon-blockingThe run uses a fallback, skips an optional layer, or intentionally keeps a diagnostic isolated.
BLOCKINGAction neededA core source failed in a way that can invalidate a major part of the run, such as all props being empty.

Pre-Lineup Hitter Context

The model does not wait for confirmed batting orders to use hitter-pool context. Before official lineups post, it builds an active-roster view from known team rosters and player IDs, including batter handedness and a PA-weighted active-roster K% profile for K props. Once confirmed lineups post, lineup order, top-six K%, and confirmed platoon mix replace the roster estimate.

StateHow it is used
Pre-lineupActive-roster batter handedness and active-roster K% feed K-prop opponent context. The report labels lineup order as late data, not missing data.
Confirmed lineupExact batting order upgrades the context with lineup K%, top-six K%, projected PA, and confirmed platoon concentration gates.
No roster coverageThe model falls back to team-level K%, handedness splits, recent team batting, BVP, and pitch-type matchup data.

Report Artifacts

ArtifactUse it for
Main HTML reportDaily human review: ranked plays, trust tiers, data readiness, diagnostics, and reference guide.
Full audit HTMLCandidate-level debugging across best plays, good adds, passes, hard fades, and research holds.
Audit JSONMachine-readable evidence for settled review, AI review, market health, pitcher assessments, HR likelihood, HRR research, and pitcher outs gate candidates.
Performance reportSettled tracker analysis by grade, market, odds band, top-pick status, and prop/game grouping.
Tracker CSVSingle source for settled W/L/P, units, grades, bet type, final signal, and historical performance windows.

NRFI — No Run First Inning

ColumnMeaning
Away SP / Home SPProbable starter name (or TBD if not yet announced)
NRFI ScoreComposite score out of 10. ≥7.7 = PLAY. SP quality (40%) blends xFIP + xwOBA allowed when Savant data is available; K-rate (35%); team offense (25%)

Sizing Guide

LabelEdge RequiredSuggested Unit Size
FULL≥20%Full unit
HALF≥15%Half unit
QRTR≥15%Quarter unit (data quality cap)
(none)<15%No bet — below threshold

Confidence Guide

LabelWhat it means
HIGHBoth pitchers and both offenses have full stat profiles
MEDOne or more data sources are missing or incomplete
LOWModel running mostly on league averages — proceed with caution

Model Notes

TermDefinition
xFIPExpected Fielding Independent Pitching — ERA predictor that strips out defense and luck. Lower = better pitcher. League avg ~4.20
wRC+Weighted Runs Created Plus — offensive quality. 100 = league average. 115+ = above average. Estimated from team OPS via MLB Stats API
Recent formLast 5 starts blended at 35% weight, season stats at 65%
Park factorVenue run/HR factor applied to expected total. Coors Field ~1.32, Oracle Park ~0.92
EdgeModel win probability minus the book's implied probability (after vig removal)
EV/$100Expected value: (win_prob × profit) − (loss_prob × stake)
F5 betsFirst 5 innings — pitching weight raised to 65% (starters matter more), scaled to 4.5/9.0 IP
DK noteThe "Bet on DK" button opens DraftKings' MLB section. Game-specific deep links require DK's partner event ID, not included in the free Odds API tier

Disclaimer: For informational and research purposes only. Bet responsibly. Always verify probable pitchers and lineups before placing any bet. Past model performance does not guarantee future results.